After five years of revisions and accretions to my huge seventeenth and
  eighteenth posts, I come to write a nineteenth one. The number is magical for
  me because, when I was a baby, I
  lived with my mother and father in one room in an old London house kept by
  Neapolitan Italians, 19 Hornsey Rise, London N19. 
  And so often I have returned to where the house stood, as if by sitting on the
  park-bench in the beautiful peace garden which may mark the site of our room,
  I could become whole again. The house is gone, my parents are gone, and my
  efforts to make contact with the remaining members of the Maccariello family,
  who kept the house, have come to nothing. Twice, on the phone, I have been
  abused and threatened by a member of that family, who would not give his name,
  for having had the temerity to try and contact them.
  Yet I have a photo of myself as a baby, sitting on my mother's lap, surrounded
  by the laughing and merrymaking Italians in a dark but convivial room of their
  house. Why, when so many years later, I tried to meet them, did they not want
  to know me?
  I am uneasy now with the number nineteen. It is almost twenty, but not quite.
  It falls short. When I lived so unhappily (but with hours of great happiness)
  in the Portuguese resort of Altura, I always tried to keep the bill at the
  restaurants, including the tip, to 19 Euros. If I got one Euro change from a
  20 Euro note, I was happy. If they presented me with a bill for 21, I became
  angry. But why did I get upset, just like that half-Pole half-Italian on the
  phone?
  Twenty-one could be better really. I was born on 21st August 1955. Near my
  twenty-first birthday, on a warm night in Oxford, I had my first sexual
  experience for almost two years. And the book that means most to me is the
  Gospel of John, and that has twenty-one chapters, and the chapter I love most
  is the twenty-first, where the risen Christ is cooking breakfast for his
  disciples on the shore when they are out fishing at night, and they glimpse
  him as he stands over the brazier in the light of dawn, but at first, as
  happened before, they do not know him. It is a scene so unearthly and yet so
  down-to-earth, a glimpse of what earthly harmony and heavenly peace might be
  like, a vision of love that speaks to us over two thousand years.
  But John's book is eternally marred by his hatred of the Jews. He can never
  escape the hate that mixes with the love he wants to show. Life is essentially
  tragic. It will always go wrong.
  And I begin my nineteenth post on 19th November 2021. But in order to reach a
  conclusion to the disordered and demanding record of the eighteen misshapen
  and sometimes absurdly long pieces, I should bring the number to twenty-one.
  Then, in another year whose number I do not yet know,  an account of some
  radiant encounter, such as John had as he stood in the boat and said to Peter,
  "It is the Lord," may bring my blog to a satisfying conclusion.
  And as the number on the screen countdown box has reached twenty-one, I will
  tell what the subject of my nineteenth post will be. No, the number of minutes
  is twenty. I will wait until it hits nineteen. Now it has. And I remember that
  other electronic device so many years ago which seemed to tell me that my
  grandfather was Joseph Goebbels. Can anything so fantastic possibly be true?
  Yes. it can.
  In this post, with the box now at eighteen, and safely past the magic numbers,
  I will detail the process by which I came to the knowledge I have mentioned.
  Seventeen now. Well, it was the late December of 2005. I had gone to Altura.
  Twice in the darkness I walked past the silent and mysterious house, the house
  that was mine, the house I could not enter. I spoke to the ambiguous people
  who inhabited the village, who might be friends, might be enemies. I became
  very upset and "disturbed", as they say. I was an official mental health case
  as it happens, although I had arranged to be classified as such in order to
  escape the dole, where you had to sign on every two weeks, which hampered my
  program of world travel.
  I went back to Faro, where I was to catch the plane to England. It was the
  morning of 24th December, 2005, Christmas Eve. I was to depart that late
  lunchtime. In the late morning, I sat in a small cafe in the downtown of Faro.
  It was called the Snack-Bar da Baixa. And suddenly one of the multiple blocks
  that had affected my memories of my childhood was cleared.
  The memories horrified me. They were of my mother and the man who brought me
  up engaged in international smuggling. I believed them both to be my parents
  then and for many years afterwards. I was a child alone with them in the car
  and then on the Channel ferry. And I remembered the terrible anxiety as we
  approached England. I remembered my mother saying, again and again, "Now
  remember, son, whatever you do don't look at the customers!" (That was her way
  of referring to the customs officials.)
  And I remembered the three of us walking through the Nothing to Declare
  corridor, and how I held my mother's hand, and prayed that she could protect
  me from the danger that threatened us if we were caught by the men who stood
  so silently on either side.
  And then, even worse, I remembered that, once, when we were approaching the
  channel port in northern France, they received some sort of message and
  decided that it would be better to enter by another port. And I remembered
  that they drove all night far across the coast of France until we reached what
  was probably St Malo. And I remembered I could not sleep because of the
  anxiety I felt for myself and for them.
  (One of the many people who have been doubtful about my claims once suggested
  to me that my memories of the international smuggling were false memory. I
  know this is not so and for the following reason. Very late in her long life,
  I raised the question with the last-surviving of my mother's sisters, Eva, and
  she admitted that my mother and the man who brought me up had indulged in
  smuggling and said it was always a case of port which was disguised as
  crockery. This aunt (she was a half-aunt really, except that there is no such
  thing as a half-aunt, someone is either your aunt or she is not) was the only
  one of the half-sisters who habitually told comic stories, which was something
  she had in common with my mother. Now she pictured Mum sniffing at the crate
  that contained the concealed wine and saying ecstatically, "Que rica loiƧa!",  "What magnificent crockery!"
  My aunt went on to say that the port was purely for private consumption, but I
  remembered my mother and the man who brought me up being notably abstemious in
  their consumption of alcohol, and I think that in this part of her account my
  aunt was lying. She may well also have been lying when she said the smuggled
  goods were always only port wine.)
  Now I sat transfixed in the snack bar, coffee long finished. I was fifty years
  old, and up to that time, for almost all my adult years, had been almost
  entirely unable to remember anything about my childhood. My memories began at
  the age of eighteen when I went to Oxford. Almost everything before that had
  been blocked out.
  But in the years after 2005, more was to come back to me, and I was to
  discover something of my strange background. My mother and the man who brought
  me up were both dead by the time I sat in the snack-bar. They had died in 2002
  and 2004. I was in a state of mental distress because my mother, whom I loved,
  had left her house to someone I believed then to be a stranger. In fact he
  appears to be my half-brother. My father was still alive in 2005 and for some
  years to come, but I did not know this, for I did not even know he existed,
  still believing Arthur Ernest Hills Junior to be my biological father.
  But I already knew that everything was not as it seemed to be. I was by now
  fully aware that my mother had spoken Neapolitan Italian better than
  Portuguese, even though she was supposed to be entirely a Portuguese. And I
  had been told by three old women that my mother had told them at about the
  time of my birth that the father of my father had been a Pole or perhaps a
  German, even though he was supposed to be entirely from Kent.
  As I moved towards England, more memories began flooding on me, and more
  strange ideas about these mysterious ancestors, all dead - as I believed then
  - began to develop as my state of agitation became more intense. I was
  focusing particularly on our holiday in Italy when I was about ten, which had
  followed another in Germany and Austria the previous year (usually we went to
  Portugal). After leaving Italy we had entered Switzerland and stopped in a
  small town and they went to visit a bank and locked me in the car. They were
  gone a long time and I began to panic alone. I was enormously relieved when
  they finally returned and I experienced my mother's love. 
  Now, on the plane, I began to believe that they had arranged to pick up Nazi
  gold while in Germany where my real paternal ancestry lay, got hold of it the
  following year in Italy, and then deposited it in a Swiss bank. But how was I
  to get the gold? I had no idea what the small town was, what the bank was. I
  knew they were in Switzerland.
  (It was the third of the old women who had suggested to me that my grandfather
  might have been German rather than Polish, while the first two had not
  mentioned this possibility. I cannot remember exactly when she made the
  suggestion, but it was shortly before the time of the visit to the Algarve and
  the sudden access of memory. I immediately believed the German origin to be
  more likely, because both myself and my mother were strongly interested in and
  attached to things German and had no interest in Poland. I think it is
  possible that, around the time I was almost eighteen, she had planted the idea
  in my mind that I was partly German without my knowing this had happened. She
  could be very subtle in that way.
  When I had only the evidence of the first two women, and not that of the
  third, I had become totally desperate during a long walk around outer West
  London to know who my ostensibly Polish grandfather had been and had written -
  for the second time since losing contact with him about twenty years before -
  to the man who had brought me up and whom I still believed to be my father,
  Arthur Ernest Hills. The first time, he had sent back a letter so cruelly
  insulting that it had deeply shocked a friend to whom I showed it. It had
  shaken me as well and I had left the old man alone a long time. This second
  letter was somewhat briefer and a little less grim, but it said, "If you have
  no descendants, you do not need roots. You are a full stop."
  This brief note, written quite shortly before the death of Arthur Ernest
  Hills, finished off by saying that the idea that his father had been a Pole
  was "nonsense.")
  As we neared my own country, I remembered Mum and the fact that she was so
  fluent in Neapolitan Italian.  Could she have arrived in Portugal from
  Italy during the war and been adopted by a Portuguese family as their own?
  There were a few strange Italian connections and names in the remote rural
  region that she was ostensibly from. Could a colony of Italians have arrived
  there and passed themselves off as Portuguese? But she had been very attached
  to the man who appeared to be her father, who had been the very image of a
  Portuguese peasant, and she could tell childhood stories about the five women
  who were ostensibly her sisters. Both these facts suggested that she had
  really grown up in that remote rural region and was really Portuguese.
  And then I thought about the man whom I still believed to be my father, and
  about the man, whom I had known, who had seemed to be his father, and whom the
  first of the three old women had insisted was my real grandfather, even though
  he was apparently of Polish origin and not English as I had always supposed.
  How come the background of these two men seemed to be so firmly rooted in
  England and Scotland (Arthur's mother had ostensibly been an Edinburgh woman)
But the family had apparently been broken up by the poor law when my
  ostensible father had been about seven, around 1932, and he had said in some tapes he had
  made for me before I stopped seeing him that he could remember nothing about
  his first seven years. This seemed suspicious. Could those first seven years
  have been spent in Germany? But how had he been inserted into the English and
  Scottish family? He had told stories about an uncle Fred who drove a van and
  who had given him a toy parrot which was the last souvenir he had of his
  childhood until his own son, Chris Hills, destroyed it. And I had met an aunt
  Connie in Gillingham, who was apparently Fred's sister, during my own
  childhood. These facts suggested an English background.
  I spent the whole plane journey in a state of almost frantic anxiety,
  puzzlement and grief, and when I reached Heathrow decided to get a hugely
  expensive taxi to my flat in Clapham through the dark afternoon so that I
  could reach the comfort of my home as soon as possible.
  Regular readers of my blog will remember that I once had four male friends. Mentions of them in this blog go back to the first post I wrote, and indeed they move like jagged
  ghosts through my mind, and this applies also to Bill Hicks, with whom I am
  still on terms. The first of these to come into this post is the most
  ambiguous, the most impressive, and the most evil of the four, Mark Casserley.
  He was the one on whom I depended the most.
  Mark had come to me one dark night. It was towards the Christmas of 1989. He
  attended a writers' group of which I had long been a member, made up mainly of
  elderly people whom I had thought were my friends, but from whose company I
  was eventually to be thrown out, with him conniving. He seemed most
  sympathetic and civilised at this first meeting. His mother had recently died,
  he had had to move out of his father's house, he was living as a lodger in the
  house of an unsympathetic man in Putney, and he had come to us for Christmas
  comfort. Or so it seemed.
  After the meeting, and with the old people dispersing to their homes, I
  invited Mark to come with me to a nearby pub. As we sat there, he seemed to
  share so many cultural interests with me and to understand so much of my own
  personal life that I had the strange sensation that I had always known him,
  that he had not just entered my life on that dark night.
  I hastened to become his close friend. And, with his great practicality, and
  his intellectual gifts, he began to take over my life. But the sensation that
  I had always known him never once returned. Instead I was confronted with the
  endless mystery of this character which on that first occasion had seemed so
  readily to open itself. He did everything for me, with no payment expected and
  little unwillingness, but never showed me the slightest affection. And as the
  years went on this began increasingly to disturb me. And as my dependence on
  him became more and more, and his contempt for my helplessness more readily
  apparent, eventually my attitude towards him crystallised into hatred. 
  But the years were long when Mark was my boon companion. Sometimes I would be
  lying luxuriously in bed, and Mark would be in the sitting-room hoovering, or
  in the kitchen, performing some other task. My bedroom door would be firmly
  shut against him. I did not wish to see him at his work, or learn how to use
  the hoover. It was enough for me that he was taking care of everything, as my
  mother had once done.
  One day in particular comes back to me. It was a Christmas Day. This was 
  probably at some date in the mid-1990s, my diaries are gone for those years,
  so I shall never know the exact year. In those days I dreaded being alone on
  Christmas Day and of course the transport is off In London. At that time, Mark
  shared a grim terraced house in Morden with some friends, they had gone back
  to their families for the season, and, although it was a very long way to walk
  there, I  offered to do this so that I should not be alone.
  In the late morning I set out, and the way was grim along the long winding
  road that leads past the Northern Line stations - Clapham South, Balham,
  Tooting Broadway, Tooting Bec, Colliers Wood - but quite a lot of people were
  about and many of the foreign shops were open, so I trudged on and stayed
  cheerful. At last I arrived at Morden, he gave me lunch, and then, in exhaustion I fell asleep on his sofa while he played Sibelius Symphonies Two
  and Three on his CD, or it might have been Three and Four. He told me the
  exact numbers of the symphonies when I woke up but I cannot be sure of them
  now. But I think it was Symphonies Two and Three. No 4 is the harshest and
  most disturbing of the Sibelius Symphonies, while the third is an optimistic
  work building to a climax of triumphant power and No 2 has a hard, marching,
  impenetrable joy. And Mark was a person of almost unyielding determination,
  always keen to put his best foot forward.  These haunting works wove
  their way most memorably through my dreams and I never saw or knew the
  silent person who sat listening to them.
   Finally I awoke, it was already dark, he was there, and he gave me the
  simple and filling type of supper at which he excelled. And quite soon after
  that it was time to start on the long journey once again, and he offered to
  come with me part of the way, and in the end he walked with me as far as
  Clapham South. From there it was quite an easy stretch to my flat, so I didn't
  suffer. How grateful I was to him for what seemed that selfless gesture!
  Sometimes Mark would say strange things to me. Once he said, "Like all
  military types, you´re good at intelligence." And, although I have never had
  anything to do with the military, I think it is possible I have the same
  mindset in a civilian context. And another time he said that there was
  something incalculable about my eyes. And it is true I tend to reveal my true
  character only in my writing.
  I have begun to hate people suddenly many times in my life. I do not usually
  tell them my feelings have changed. This is how it happened with him, and to
  tell it I need to go back to near the start of our relationship.
  Besides being passionately interested in classical music, Mark also
  understands electronics to a considerable degree, both theoretically and
  practically. Very early on in our relationship he was responsible for helping
  me buy a system of separates (turntable, tuner, radio, tape player, CD
  player), and this cemented our friendship. He set up the system for me, and
  any little problems that developed with it he would always come round almost
  immediately to sort out. I still remember those days and the joy of our
  friendship and the feeling of being cared for
  A while after getting the separates, Mark helped me buy a word processor and
  trained me well in its use. The result was that I began to love this thing, which was really only a glorified typewriter, and my
  writing, which I composed late at night to music while sipping a glass of
  Moscato, progressed wonderfully. The years 1990 and 1991 were the happiest of my life. I had work, mostly during the evening, in a
  strange second-hand bookshop in central London. I did not lack
  for friends, and soon Mark was helping me with money. I essayed a novel, and felt
  sure it would be published. I read it to Mark page by page, stressing to him how soulful and elegiac my beautiful composition was.
  In the summer of 1990 I went to see my mother in Portugal, left her in order
  to travel to Morocco, got stuck in Tangier for three days because I missed the
  ferry, and went to visit Paul Bowles, who in those days was a celebrity
  author. On an idle autumn Friday in London, I told someone about the
  experience and that person suggested I write up my visit to Bowles. I did this
  immediately, got the editorial say-so from Mark on one of our
  regular Saturday lunchtime meetings that the next day, and sent the
  piece to The Guardian on the Monday. On Wednesday afternoon, Mark was with me
  at my flat and we decided not to go to the meeting of PEN which was taking
  place that evening. Then the Guardian phoned. They had accepted the piece. I
  was later to discover that only about one in a thousand articles sent to them
  on spec was accepted.
I said at the beginning of this post that life inevitably goes wrong. This
certainly seems to have been true of what triumphs I have had in my life. The
Paul Bowles piece was published by The Guardian on 1st January 1991. This should
have been a wonderful omen, to get my first piece printed by a national
newspaper on the first day of the decade. But I was alone when the triumph came.
My mother was staying, having come over from Portugal, but
she had gone to see a female friend from East London to whom I had taken a
dislike, and was away for the night. Mark and everyone else were engaged elsewhere. And I had failed to
insist to The Guardian that my writing name was C.A.R. Hills and they had
printed the piece under Charles Hills. I was to get two other pieces
published by the Guardian, had trouble with the the third one, and have never
again written for that paper. There were also three pieces in the Telegraph,
then never again. None of my relationships with any outlet have proved
permanent.
  On that New Year's Day I tried to share what joy I still felt with people over
  the phone. But it is difficult to share joy over the phone. And Mark's cool
  voice, so utterly devoid of any feeling for me, seemed to make him a
  particularly chilling interlocutor. Even when he had been with me when the
  news had first come, he had not suggested we go out to a wine bar to
  celebrate. That had hurt me.
  It is difficult to recall exactly when my affection for Mark became tinged
  with dislike. But I think it may have been on that occasion. And when an
  emotional process begins with me, I can never stop it until a conclusion has
  been reached.  I can often conceal it, though, then reveal it at an odd
  moment.
  The second of the three main stages by which I came to hate him was in the
  spring of 2000. This was when my mother came to London and more or less told
  me that she had left her house to Flavio Rosa and my lifelong love for her died, quite suddenly, never fully to return. After her statement., at a Wednesday lunchtime, I entered two days of madness
  where I constantly roamed the streets of London, returning to the house
  periodically to abuse my Mum. On the first of these nights I rang Mark from
  the basement of the Piccadilly Waterstone's, where in those days there was a
  public phone. His reaction to my distress horrified me. He said that Flavio
  was looking after my mother and had a right to share in her inheritance. The
  cold, rational tone in which he spoke, similar to the one in which he had
  greeted the news of my newspaper article, alienated me in a way I had never
  experienced before.
  Perhaps on that night, but more likely on the following one, I met Bill Hicks
  by chance on the bus near our homes, shared my news, and he invited me back to
  his flat, where he showed the sympathy and understanding for my situation that
  I regarded as proper. From that time, although Mark was officially still my
  best friend, and continued to do everything for me, Bill really fulfilled that
  function, and this equally ambiguous person largely took the place of my
  mother in my affections over long years. 
  The time when I would really hate Mark began in late 2005, shortly before the
  period of which I am speaking now. In the spring and summer of that
  year I had gone on an extended tour of the Far East and Australia, to complete
  the world journey of which I had dreamed for so many years. On returning from
  that trip, and now having visited the five continents and sailed the seven
  seas without accomplishing any great change in myself, I fell into depression and withdrawal from the world.
  I have never liked television, and have only intermittently owned a telly, but in order to alleviate my misery Mark suggested I should
  try having one again. I clutched at this emotional straw. In his
  usual helpful but impersonal way, he came with me to a warehouse in south
  London, helped me choose a set and bring it home in a taxi, and set it up for
  me in my living-room.
  It was almost six o'clock, and in joy and hope I suggested we share a drink
  and watch the News together. But Mark had lately become disgusted by my lack
  of hygiene, which had probably become worse because of my depression. He
  said he had to go, and my  desperate persuasion had no effect. I gave up, watched the News alone, could not bear to pour myself a drink, and knew I
  hated him.
  Christmas Eve was a few weeks after that. I had given Mark no hint of my new
  feelings. He was totally in charge of all the electronic equipment in my flat
  - television, system of separates, word processor - or so it seemed.
  On my way back from the Algarve to my flat I think I phoned Mark several
  times. Perhaps it was once from Faro Airport, once from Heathrow, once when I
  reached home. Ever since I was young, I have been passionately interested in
  W. Somerset Maugham. Several times Mark mentioned to me that Radio Four was
  broadcasting a feature programme about Maugham between three and four that
  afternoon. I think I may partly have got the taxi precisely so that I could
  reach the flat before the programme began at three, and I know I managed 
  to do that.
  I turned the radio on a little before the hour. Reception was
  perfect. Just as the programme started, heavy interference began. I was bitterly disappointed, and phoned Mark
  again. He did not seem worried. It was just interference, he said, and would
  soon pass off. But it did not. All through the hour the loud noise continued, under which I could just hear indistinguishable voices. I turned the
  radio off and on again and again in order to try and hear something. I may
  have phoned Mark again, I don't know. Four o'clock came, and immediately the
  programme was over the interference stopped.
  Mark continued to be his usual imperturbable self. It was just an accident, he
  said, and nothing to worry about. People always say this sort of thing when
  something strange happens which they cannot explain and which seems not
  directly to affect them. They just want to clear the matter from their mind
  and yours and get a puzzled person on his way.
  But to me the fact that the interference began exactly at three and ended
  exactly at four, so that the whole Maugham programme was blocked out but
  nothing else, indicates that the radio must have been deliberately jammed. I
  once asked Bill how this could have been done, and he said that it would best
  have been achieved by someone standing outside in the street with an
  interference generator perhaps in a rucksack. I never went into Albion Avenue
  during the hour the interference continued, but the street with its many
  council flats on either side would have been dark and empty during the hour,
  and someone perhaps taking a certain amount of cover would have been unlikely
  to be noticed by anyone.
  I have said that, up to this point, Mark was in full charge of all the
  electronics in my flat, including the radio, which was part of the system of
  separates. He wanted me to hear that Maugham programme because he thought it
  would calm me down and he had no interest in my being alarmed. On
  one of the phone calls during that day he arranged to come round to see me on
  the early evening of 27th December when he said he would listen to my worries,
  which I had not really explained in detail, and we would surely be able to
  clear them up.
  It follows from all this that Mark was not responsible for the jamming and
  that someone else was. That person was now in charge of the electronics in my
  flat, and that person wanted me eventually to know that this was the fact. Now
  who could this have been? This question brings me to the second of my four
  ambiguous friends, the half-Croat Stephen Cviic, a man once very handsome, now
  ageing, whose grandfather, like mine, had been fiendishly connected to the
  Nazi past, and with whose immediate family (the grandfather was long dead) I
  was due to take lunch that Christmas Day.
  I first met Stephen (there should be an acute accent at the end of his
  surname, but I cannot be bothered with Slav orthography) when we both worked
  as desk editors at the BBC Monitoring Service, which is located at the mansion
  of Caversham Park, outside Reading. And thereby hangs a tale of my nineteenth
  months at the service, which I will tell briefly, in order to introduce my
  relationship with Steve.
  I was editing the transcripts of foreign broadcasts in Part One, which was the
  Former Soviet Union, an area about which I knew nothing. Steve was in Part
  Four, which covered the rest of the world from the other three parts,
  including Latin America, in which he was already a specialist - he was later
  to be the BBC Correspondent in Brazil. I knew French, Spanish and Portuguese,
  so I should really perhaps have been in Part Four as well, although the man
  who ran it was particularly irascible, so perhaps in Part Four I would not
  have lasted even as long as I did. last. I was also the only one of the seven
  trainees who started at the same time to be on temporary contracts, and
  perhaps if I had had full employment rights again I would have been dismissed
  quite quickly, and in fact one of the six in permanent employment, a would-be
  upper-class Greek, who presented problems analogous to mine, was let go before
  I was.
  All the parts had strict supervisors (the Monitoring Service
  was a mixture of political correctness with old-fashioned BBC
  oppression), and the Soviet-style clones in Part One were in general
  particularly nasty, although there were also a few disaffected and more pleasant people in the part.
  I was initially trained by a medium-rank employee, the Libyan Mohamed
  El-Doufani, a malevolent cripple in a wheelchair, and I was quickly aware that
  he had taken a great dislike to me, and I was later to discover, in
  circumstances I shall shortly relate, that during the training he was
  obsessively writing on scraps of paper, "Kill Hills! Kill Hills!" (I am a Jew,
  and I believe he suspected that).
  However, his hatred of me proved useful when I came to walk out of the BBC
  eighteen months later. Here is the story. In the latter part of my time at the
  service, I was preparing to buy my ex-council flat, something which would have
  been impossible while I had been happily on the dole. The fact that I owned
  the flat was later to be of great importance to me. For instance, when I went
  to prison for a considerable period, the flat would almost certainly have been taken from me if I had still been a tenant,
  whereas because I was an owner they could not touch it. During the period I was in prison there were  works to the windows of the estate at vast expense, but because I was not available they had to leave my windows alone and not charge me. And soon after I
  came out of prison, and I skipped my licence by going abroad, the flat was sold by
  my power-of-attorney Bill Hicks, and I was able to spend almost five years
  swanning about Europe, Israel and Palestine before returning to prison when
  the resources from the sale of the flat were almost exhausted. And this second period in prison laid the foundations for my further career at the expense of the British state. Thank you Mrs Thatcher for making it possible for me.
  And, back then in 1994, now I had the flat under my belt, it seemed the time
  had come to bring my association with the Monitoring Service to an end.
  The contract was signed on Friday 15th March 1994. On the Sunday, in the late
  afternoon, I was alone in the office, because the others, including Mohamed,
  who had been particularly unpleasant that time, had gone home, while I must
  stay because I had arrived quite late from London. I had no intention of doing
  any work now I was unsupervised. It was cold, dark and still. The hour I left
  the office might be noticed. I was wondering what to do. So I wrote an email
  to my line manager. She was a dried-up BBC spinster in early middle-age. So I
  accused her of being anal-retentive.
  On the Monday, when I arrived innocently at the office, all hell broke loose.
  I was to last for about a month after that, a time of endless emails whizzing
  back and forth with almost nobody talking face to face, a time when, according
  to my Scottish friend Lewis McLeod, who worked in Part Three (Far East)I was
  suffering a nervous breakdown. The final showdown came on 19th April 1994. In
  the morning, I went to the toilet and Mohamed was just coming out, an
  altercation developed, and I abused him in words I do not exactly remember.
  When I returned to my desk, the line manager (her exact title was Duty Editor)
  approached me and said that I had abused Mohamed racially. This was untrue,
  and I said so. But she insisted it was true and demanded that I apologise.
"Oh, just fuck off," I said.
"I ask you to retract that statement," the goggle-eyed woman said.
"No, fuck off again."
  Now the authorities in Part One were keen for a disciplinary hearing to be
  held, which might well lead to my being summarily sacked. At that point, the
  fifth of my five contracts  still had five weeks to run. If I went back
  on the dole after my contract had expired, I could get straight back on the
  payments, which now include a contribution towards the mortgage on the flat.
  But if I were summarily sacked, the process of getting money would be long and
  complex. But one of my friends at the service stepped in. 
  This was Jenny Norton of Part One, a very beautiful young woman who was also a
  Russian expert. She either went, or was summoned, to Mike Butcher, who was the
  manager in charge of all the parts. At this meeting Mohamed's obsessive hatred
  for me came out and also the fact that he had been writing down his wish to
  kill me when he was training me. Jenny also detailed the general atmosphere of
  persecution I had suffered in Part One and what she kindly said were my
  sincere efforts  to fit in there and do a good job. Mike Butcher already
  knew about all this apparently.
  Jenny now met me privately in the main lobby of the service. She told me at
  that meeting about Mohamed's scribblings. It was common knowledge, it seemed,
  but had been kept from me. I had already indicated that I wished to leave
  immediately but for the five weeks of my contract to run and to receive
  payment for them. Jenny said that Butcher was sympathetic to me, did not wish
  the disciplinary hearing to be held, and was favourable to the terms I had
  mentioned. I agreed that it was much better the hearing not go ahead, but said
  it must do so if my terms were not agreed.
  A bit later, I was called in to see Butcher. He was very friendly, quickly
  agreed to the settlement I had proposed, and apologised to me for the fact
  that the Monitoring Service had not been able to give me the conditions where
  I could perform at my best. I could leave now at whatever point in the day I
  wished. He said he hoped I would find another job in which I could fully use
  my talents. I said I intended never to get a full-time job again. He thought
  this would be impossible in the circumstances. There he showed a lack of
  knowledge of the world. I was to manage pretty well in the years that were to
  come, although there were a few dangerous and even desperate corners.
  I returned to my desk and sent Jenny a jubilant email with the strapline,
  "Saved at the last minute by a very cruel butcher."
I did not ask for work (you were expected to request another task
  immediately you had finished editing any item or had returned to your desk).
  But I had one more job to perform before I could leave. This was a bit
  difficult, because I was poor at using even the old-fashioned computers
  we had in those days. I knew how to send an email to one person but not to the
  whole of Part One. But I called in another friend, I think not Jenny, to held
  me send an elegant general farewell. It mentioned that
  Mohamed had lied when he said |I had abused him racially, and I said I thought
  it was a pity he would stoop so low.as to lie in order to incriminate me.
  There was consternation in the office when this email was received,
  and Mohamed seemed to be making a mad dash in his direction, but was
  restrained by the spinster.
  I rose to my feet. went over to Jenny, and said I was about to go. This sassy
  young lady said she would accompany me to the gates and we walked away together from what may have been a sarcastic comment made by said spinster. We went out of
  the ancient building, towards the grounds where there were graves of three
  boys who had died there when the place had been an inter-war public school. We
  went past the hostel where I had often stayed to avoid the journey to and from
  and approached the magnificent gates of the mansion where King Charles I had
  been briefly imprisoned. Fine decorative urns surmounted this approach to
  grandeur and suffering. I looked back once at Caversham Park, Jenny gave me a
  kiss, and I almost ran all the way down the road to Reading Station.
  I have looked up Mohamed on the Internet from the days I finally became able
  to use a Windows computer, and he was long at the BBC, but has apparently now
  retired, and is specialising as a commentator on the Arab-Israeli conflict. He
  may be only slightly more biased that the UN Secretary General, a Portuguese,
  and my own ancestry is partly from there - and that country is only on the
  other side of the Mediterranean from North Africa - and partly probably from
  Greece - even nearer - and, as a Jew, partly from the south-eastern side of
  the Mediterranean, which, of course, is not a million miles from Libya. So it
  would hardly have made sense for me to have abused Mohamed racially. But the
  BBC would not have understood that. To them, I would be a white and he a
  black. It was certainly better for me the hearing was not held, and it also
  could have done much damage to Part One and the BBC. My mortgage service,
  which including payment protector insurance for innocent loss of employment,
  tried to find out later under what circumstances I had left, but the
  corporation remained shtumm.
  So my time in Part One, with the grim young Englishman known as Watchman, and
  the harsh young Scotswoman Morven (to whom I once wished Merry Christmas in
  May),  was really a bit of a breeze, and of course I met Steve. He was
  like a young Greek god, except that his chest did not live up to his strong
  legs, a disproportion which is often the case with fine-looking men about whom
  there is something wrong. But he was certainly large, beautiful and
  stern-looking enough in his mid-twenties to kindle my fantasies. He used often
  to wear a rich yellow woollen jumper to work, and he was later to show me a
  photograph of himself sporting it and emerging from a very green bush with a
  most innocent and serene expression. Which Greek God was he? Apollo? No,
  hardly that. Pan? Pan of the cloven hoof half-hidden? Nearer. Not quite,
  though. No, he isn't a god. But I fooled myself he was.
  Steve came of actual and BBC aristocracy on both sides. His mother, Celia, a
  person with whom my relations were always faintly awkward, is (if she is still
  alive, I do not know) of the old English family of Antrobus. His paternal
  background is more exotic, more mysterious and more unacceptable if generally
  known. Steve told me in 2006, when out intimacy was at its height, both that
  his paternal grandfather was the leading furniture manufacturer in the former
  Yugoslavia during the inter-war period and that he had been a member of the
  Ustase, the wartime Croatian government which outdid even the Nazis themselves
  in its persecution of the Jews. This grandfather went to Paris after the war
  and died there, according to Steve, in 1948. The subject of the Ustase is not
  in general well-served by Wikipedia or the Internet and I have been unable to
  find anyone called Cviic as associated with it. I think it is probable that
  Steve's surname, like mine, is an assumed one. But possibly not.
  The son of the fascist, the Christopher Cviic I knew (born in 1930, original
  Christian name Crsto, usually known in England as Chris, the surname comes out
  as something like "Sveech") remained in the former Yugoslavia after the war,
  and was able to leave it by a ruse in the late 1950s to come to work in
  England at the BBC. There he met Celia, who was already, I believe, a
  producer, and they married, and had two children, Stephen and Antonia. Chris,
  a large and avuncular figure, progressed marvellously in Britain and became a
  respected expert on his home region, publishing in Encounter, becoming editor
  of The World Today, and even, in later years, advising the retired Mrs
  Thatcher. The family lived in a large house in Wimbledon and were devout
  members of the local Roman Catholic church, full of musical, religious and
  other good works. They used to entertain lavishly at their house (for
  instance, a marquee was put up in the back garden for an event to mark
  Stephen's thirtieth birthday), they did their best to welcome me on many more
  private occasions, and perhaps it was my own fault that I never liked them.
  Stephen was a boy chorister, and attended the Jesuit school Wimbledon College,
  where he proved himself such an assiduous young Catholic that his schoolmates
  nicknamed him Torquemada. He then read English at New College, Oxford, without
  particular distinction. Possibly he had another job before entering the BBC,
  but I do not know what it was. He seemed when I first knew him to be a person
  of promise (although innocent in a way that would-be reporters are not
  supposed to be) and likely to progress well within the corporation. For a time
  this was indeed so. But then his upward path faltered and he entered a time of
  troubles. I believe that, as I write now in late 2024, he may have recovered
  his equilibrium. But I do not know this. It is about eleven years since I was
  last in touch with him and all my information is now from the Internet. A website I saw said that he combines professional singing with the editing of texts and translations from Croatian (not Serbian, although the languages are the same!) and from Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese (presumably the Portuguese of Portugal is so far beneath contempt that he will not deign to touch it).  
I see
  that this waster mainly performs concerts at most obscure venues, including one called the
  Rose Theatre (and the reader may remember from a previous post that I believe
  there is an international criminal organisation, based in the Algarve, and
  with neo-Nazi connections, called The Rose.)
  I have no idea whether Steve is likely to see what I am writing. I think it
  might make him very angry. For a long time I was reluctant to go on with my
  blog because I did not want to write possibly hurtful things about him. But
  now I want to tell the truth. Be damned to the feelings I once had.
  How did our friendship begin? I contrived it. At the Monitoring Service my
  daily routine did not coincide with his, but there was a way to become more
  intimate with him. Quite a number of those who worked at the service lived in
  London and travelled back and forth each day, and many of these had cars. It
  was the custom that those who had private vehicles would offer lifts to those
  who had not. Because we all lived so widely spaced out over London, often the
  lift saved no more time than relying on public transport. But it worked out
  cheaper. And there was the comfort of having company on the way to and from
  the grinding tasks of the service. Many took advantage of the arrangement.
  Having taken a series of unsatisfactory lifts from an Iranian lady, who
  dropped me somewhere near Paddington, from which the journey home in those
  days was complex, I proposed to Steve, whom I knew very slightly, that he give
  me lifts in the morning and he agreed. The journey with him, although mainly
  south of the river, was hardly easier than with the Iranian. He was coming
  from Wimbledon and passed through a traffic junction at Putney. This was some
  way south of the station. I was coming from Clapham, needed to get a bus to
  Clapham Junction, a train to Putney, and then walk. The steely young gentleman
  made it clear to me that he would not wait if I failed to turn up on time.
  In order to arrive the Monitoring Service at the appointed time (I forget what
  this was) it was necessary to get up at roughly half-past-five. Sometimes I
  could not make it. Often I was not lucky with the bus. Then I might be running
  desperately through the long tunnel at Clapham Junction to get to Platform 6,
  which was right at the end, and be rapidly ascending the stairs as the train
  to Putney was pulling out. Then I might be forced to give up hope of reaching
  Steve and catch the slow train to Reading which went through fourteen or
  fifteen stations before reaching its goal. The last before Reading was Earley,
  and I used to joke that is certainly was early when I was there.
  Sometimes there was a slight delay in the train to Putney, but I caught it
  anyway in the hope of reaching Steve, and I ran all the way from the station
  to the appointed junction, but I might arrive five minutes after the appointed
  time, and the young gentleman would already have passed, driving so carefully
  in his little bubble car. Then, after waiting a few minutes in desperate hope,
  I would have to retrieve my steps to Putney Station, get a train to Richmond,
  and join the slow train to Reading one stop ahead of normal. I would arrive
  pretty late at the Monitoring Service and have long hours to be there. But
  sometimes I would stay at the hostel so that it would not be necessary to
  repeat my performance the following morning. My Scottish friend Lewis used to
  say that you only needed three things to stay at the hostel: a spare pair of
  pants, deodorant and an alarm clock. I always had these and often my
  much-loved word-processor as well, with which I was writing the first novel on
  which all my vain hopes reposed.
  But if I was in London, and got up heroically when the alarm-clock sounded,
  and the bus and the train came smoothly, then what joy it was to be standing
  in the semi-darkness at the impersonal junction and see Steve's car
  approaching, wave to him, and with great relief climb in and begin to talk. It
  felt great to be with him and I often wondered whether I was in love. But I
  would often stare with a sort of fascinated repulsion at the dark hairs on his
  hand I could see as he gripped the wheel. He was so fair yet the hairs on his
  hands were dark. At such moments I knew I did not love him but despised him.
  But there was one way in which I proved useful. He was interested in Latin
  America and already knew excellent Spanish. But he was at that time switching
  his interest to Brazil, for which country he had conceived a sentimental
  schwaermerei, so he needed to learn Portuguese as quickly as he could. I
  myself had been studying the language for many years and, although my
  practical knowledge was still limited, certain points I had clearly
  understood. Steve was particularly puzzled about what would be the translation
  of the English word "it" when used as an object pronoun. One morning, sitting
  in his car, I was able to explain that, in Portuguese, the object pronouns,
  which often consist only of a single vowel, are generally felt to be so weak
  that, if there is no absolute need to use them, they are simply omitted. The
  answer for the translation of "it" is that there isn't one. Steve was
  delighted to learn this simple but recherchƩ fact, and it bound him to me. He
  pressed me for ever more details during our morning journeys and sometimes I
  was able to answer.
  But his attitude to Portugal was typical of people in England, and other
  European countries who are interested in Brazil. They try to pretend Portugal
  does not exist. The rest of the Portuguese-speaking world doesn't either.
  Portugal in particular is beneath contempt. It had no part in the making of
  Brazil. The language spoken there is something radically different. Brazil is
  not an outlier linguistically speaking among the Portuguese-speaking countries
  but the norm for the language. Such attitudes, ignorant, parochial and
  ahistorical, are the despair of those who know Portugal and once loved it.
  Steve was an annoying example of the species. With his large, serious eyes
  fixed on mine, he would gleefully tell me the latest example he had heard of
  the piada sobre portuguĆŖs, the jokes Brazilians tell about the Portuguese. He
  would remark that the Brazilians must be the only people who joke
  about their former colonisers. At one point I was foolish enough to tell him
  the slang word the Portuguese often use to refer to themselves: "portuga", or
  simply "tuga". After this he never used the word "Portugal" but always
  referred to "Portuga-land". He never seemed to reflect on how I, as someone of
  Portuguese ancestry, might be feeling about this. And I never told him either.
  In fact, seething as I was, I joined in with mockery of my mother's country,
  as I then supposed it entirely to be. I wanted him as my lover, and anything
  that pleased him pleased me.
  If I had had any sense, I would have realised that Steve would never be what I
  almost wanted. I wasted so many years on him and have resented it ever since.
  And, even at that time, I did not enjoy the bliss of being in the car with
  him alone for very long. In later days, he often also picked up his close
  friend Riad, quite an aggressive young Arab (I forget from which country) who
  also worked in Part Four and who mouthed off a lot about Israel. I took quite
  a dislike to Riad and, pretending ignorance of how he was spelled, often used
  to joke to Steve that he had been aptly named after the capital of Saudi
  Arabia. Steve took my dislike of the Arab with total indifference and never
  tried to defend him to me. Of course, he himself was too wise to say anything
  about Israel. There was an impassivity about him, a feeling of being above the
  fray of humanity, which went with his beauty, innocence and harshness.
  Well, anyway, by the end of the my time at the Service, I had
  succeeded in establishing myself to a certain extent with Steve, though I
  still did not know him well. I had already established my nickname for him -
  Bambi - although I never used it to his face. And certainly, when he went for his ten-minute cat-nap in the lobby of the service at lunchtime he
  looked a veritable Bambi indeed. I used to marvel that he would always wake
  after exactly ten minutes and be ready for the afternoon's work. I saw
  him sleeping there on my last day, a picture of beauty. I did not dare to wake
  him, although there was a possibility I would not see him again. He told me on
  a later occasion that he had been entirely unaware of the dramatic events that
  led to my exit. I can well believe it. The whole thing would have been of
  little concern to him.
  But quite soon in the lonely and undirected time that followed my exit from
  the Monitoring Service (I wrote in my 1994 diary, long since lost, that a
  certain day was like a parabola, with melancholy at its beginning and end), I contacted Steve, proposing we meet, and slightly
  to my surprise he agreed. And from there we slipped into what became close
  friendship on his side and hopeless attraction on mine. I seem to remember
  that he made a triumphant tour of Brazil at this period, with his now
  finely-honed Portuguese, and on his return he showed me several photographs of
  very handsome men, and the third or fourth was of himself in the guise of a
  back-packer, feet firmly apart and heavy pack lightly borne, Really I do
  not think I have ever seen an image of a lovelier guy. 
  My friendship with Steve meant being welcomed to his family home and meeting
  his circle of friends. The large house in Wimbledon was that of typical
  English intellectuals: plenty of books, shabby but good furniture, a musty
  air. I remember being entertained in the garden by Steve's parents and Chris
  learnedly discoursing on the Ausgleich, which had set up the Habsburg dual
  monarchy in 1867. Celia sang in a small, sweet voice. Steve's large but pretty
  sister Antonia, also a singer, was pleasant, and had an eccentric boyfriend
  whom the family tried without success to like. Steve himself surprisingly
  lacked a girlfriend, despite his eligibility.
People used jokingly to
  refer to the family as the Honda Civics. Steve's friends were conventional and
  successful, making careers in the diplomatic service or merchant banking. I
  once went to an amateur chamber concert which Bambi and some others gave at St
  Mary's Church, Putney, and the whole thing could almost have come out of
  Victorian times.
  In 1997 Steve was appointed as the BBC correspondent in Brazil. He was to be
  away for three years and would not be returning to Britain often during this
  time. The inevitable big farewell party for family and friends was called, at
  a pub or restaurant in Wimbledon. Just before he was about to go from me, I
  impulsively planted a kiss on his cheek. He seemed a little surprised. I think
  he was strangely pleased.
  But that was the high point of our relationship. It is not really true that
  absence makes the heart grow fonder. Rather it allows the heart to adjust to
  the absence of the loved one. Those years between 1997 and 2000 were traumatic
  for us both. For me they brought the alienation from my mother that went with
  her leaving her house to someone else. She was the source of the loving
  feelings in my life, and after she betrayed me, as I saw it, the
  happy-go-lucky character which was mainly dominant in my earlier years gave
  way to the darker personality people experience now. As for Steve, during the
  second year in Brazil he experienced a severe emotional crisis comparable to
  mine. He never told me what this was and I still do not know. But, when he
  returned to England, his love of Brazil was gone and he also was a darker
  person. The wonderful backpacker photo would never be possible again.
Emotional changes take time to play out, and for a while his career seemed
  to progress.  Back in Britain, he began training as a television
  reporter. By chance, he was in New York on Nine-Eleven and was among those who
  broke the news to the British public on television. I didn't have a telly at
  that time, and anyway I was in Portugal dealing with my mother's illness, but
  my Scottish friend Lewis, whom I still knew at that time, told me that Bambi
  had cut a most magnificent figure broadcasting the terrible news.
  But quite soon after this, without explanation or warning, Steve gave up his
  career as a reporter. He took up much more routine work editing and processing
  News. But he began complaining that he disliked the world view that he was
  forced to propagate. Soon he gave this up also and left the BBC.
  It was the same story with his accommodation. When he arrived back in England,
  his parents helped him buy a large Victorian house near Clapham Junction. This
  was only about fifteen minutes ride by bus from my flat, so it should have
  brought us closer. But it did not. I remember it as a slightly gloomy house. I
  never saw the upstairs or the basement, only the ground floor. At first Steve
  shared the house, and perhaps there were large parties, although I do not
  remember much specific jollity. There was one dinner party for four, at which
  I rather shone. By the time of which I am speaking now, the Christmas Day of
  2005, Steve was living in the house alone. Later still he was to return to
  Wimbledon and his parents, and how the Elspeth Road house was disposed of I do
  not know.
  In the early years of the Millennium I used often to visit him at the house
  and sometimes we went for a walk. There was a little pathway running on the
  edge of Clapham Common and near the main road and he used to become rather
  sentimental about it and call it something like "the pathway of paradise." I
  was often in a poor mood in those days and the pathway did not seem at all
  special to me. This little piece of nature mysticism annoyed me in fact. I
  could not imagine the fine, rather cruel young man I had first known indulging
  in anything like that.
  And truly he was moving further and further from paradise, as I was. But he
  knew what had happened to me and I did not know what had happened to him.
  There could be no real sympathy between us now. But our bonds were in a way still close. He sometimes used to compare my personality to that of Toad of Toad Hall and lament with me that the stoats were in possession of the hall. Affectionately (I think it was) he would then address me as Mr Toad. But his cruelty had not entirely died. Once when I mentioned a street in Soho called Kingly Street, Steve said that perhaps it should be Queenly Street.
  After he left the BBC, Steve had two plans about what to do with his life. One
  was to develop his career as a classical singer. For this, he had a good
  voice, reasonable culture and a fine presence, but it was too late to start out
  as a musician and progress beyond purely local engagements. His other plan was
  that eternal stand-by of the English middle-classes, to write a novel. This
  was to be a panoramic account of the life of Brazil. I knew he would get
  nowhere with this, and warned him, as he attempted to read the book to me and
  gain my interest, that he faced failure. He made every point in consecutive
  sentences not twice but three times. Embedded in the book was the story of a
  young English musician adrift in Brazil which was actually quite charming, and
  if he had stuck to this guy, his book might just have been published. I told
  him this and begged him to stick to the story that might have appealed. But he
  was determined to tell the tale of a black evangelical pastor and his church
  and several other worthy and unconnected subjects and the book kept switching
  from one to another in the dullest possible way.
  There is nothing so unsexy as a handsome man labouring at fiction. By late
  2005 he was paying therapists to cure his depression and reposing the most
  unrealistic hopes on their efforts. Often, around the rim of his toilet, there
  were little stains of shit.
  But on that feast day, Christmas Day 2005, he was back to personal magnificence. He had just taken
  part in a Christmas morning concert somewhere north of the river and one of
  his fellow participants was invited to lunch. They arrived at my council
  estate in a most magnificent car, possibly a Rolls-Royce, I am not good with
  cars. It was hired for the occasion and may have been chauffeur-driven, again
  I do not remember. The friend was a camp young man who was good on keyboards.
  He was to entertain us on the piano during the day. I did not take to him,
  again do not remember his name, nor anything of his performance or
  conversation. The magnificent car did not attract me. I thought of the sweet
  little bubble car in which Bambi used to drive me to the Monitoring Service. I
  dislike unnecessary ostentation. And, as my love for him was slowly dying, he
  could do rather little I liked now.
  I remember nothing of our arrival at the house, and my further memories of
  that day begin at the family lunch (the four Honda Civics, the camp young man,
  myself, and possibly Antonia's boyfriend, who impressed me so little I cannot
  usually recall whether he was present at any occasion). Big lunches usually
  make me feel nervous and and act as a prompt to say the wrong thing. As I have
  said many times in this blog, I had four close friends in those days, who
  usually treated me in quite a distant manner, which I usually put down to
  their being English gentlemen. But in the state of puzzlement and paranoia I
  was now in, I was beginning to suspect that all four were spies for different
  powers and that was why I got so little real friendship from them. A little
  previous, I think, I had been for one of my regular Monday night evenings at
  Bill Hicks' flat, and I had raised the matter of spies, and he had said that
  London was "swarming with them". Anyway, I suddenly found myself asking,
  apropos of nothing, whether the company thought there were many spies in
  London.
  This question, coming the midst of all their pleasantries, seemed to cause
  general consternation. I can still remember the look of puzzlement and
  contemptuous irony on the camp young man's face. The elder Hondas were most
  curious to know why I had raised the subject, and possibly I mentioned the
  conversation with Bill. I think Chris Cviic finally rounded off the subject by
  saying that, though there probably were some spies in London, he and his
  family did not know any, and possibly, even then, given that he was quite a
  prominent figure in British political life, I found this a curious assertion.
  From there, and by a mechanism I cannot now remember, the conversation moved
  swiftly on to the subject of racism. I had long been troubled by the coming to
  Britain of so many foreigners (although - and I did not know it at the time -
  I was entirely one myself) and, although public discussion of the subject was
  taboo, I tended to discuss my feelings in private with Steve. It is possible
  that he had shared what he knew about my attitudes with his parents. And, as
  it happened, I had a rather unusual connection with the issue of racism which
  would interest those concerned with current affairs.
  A few years before I had written a column for the magazine Prospect called
  "Clapham Omnibus", about my disordered life in an around the South London
  council estate where I had lived for many years. Prospect was mainly a
  political magazine, closely aligned with New Labour, but the founding editor,
  David Goodhart, wanted also to publish a few items of a more light, personal
  and edgy character, and it was to this end that, having already published a
  few separate pieces by me, he had commissioned my column. Thirteen editions
  were eventually published before Clapham Omnibus was dropped, and it attracted
  a good deal of favourable comment but no commendations in print.
  My relationship with Goodhart was ambivalent. According to Jason Cowley, who
  also wrote for the magazine, Goodhart appreciated the quality of my writing
  but viewed me rather contemptuously as "a literary saddie." The way he treated
  me would certainly support the idea that this Old Etonian did not consider me
  a person of great consequence. He had taken about a year to publish the first
  article he accepted, would often not include my column in the magazine without
  warning me first, edit it extensively without consultation, and eventually
  dropped it without bothering to tell me it had gone.
  The column had made me feel more unhappy than triumphant, but I went on for
  some time sending him new possible items, and these he never acknowledged. I
  think as my final effort, I dispatched one expressing, in as tactful and
  self-effacing a manner as I possibly could, my misgivings about the racial
  situation in Britain, and particularly about the presence of so many black
  people. This was met by the usual silence, but only a few months later he
  himself published an article of considerable historic consequence which for
  the first time opened up the hitherto taboo subject of race relations. He had
  to pretend that the subject was mainly important for its impact on social
  security payments and suchlike matters rather than having anything to do with
  nationality or identity, but the importance of his piece for allowing people
  to suddenly discuss the subject of race was profound.
  This new freedom, relative as it was (for not even Nigel Farage has ever dared
  suggest that his campaign has anything to do with the survival of the
  English), came to me like a breath of fresh air in a  miasma. For many
  years, as I wandered round the area of the Larkhall Estate and the Wandsworth
  Road, I had seen two sets of scenes. The first was of a gaggle of
  schoolchildren being led around by their teachers. If there were twenty
  children, seventeen might be blacks, Indians, Chinese or Arabs, two of
  southern European appearance, and perhaps one possibly English. The other
  scene, which I also saw many times, was of some English old person who had
  lived many years on the estate walking with infinite care and courage towards
  the waiting ambulance from the home to which they would never return. In the
  year 1999, I counted nine deaths of elderly residents I knew, most of them
  celebrated with one of the traditional council estate send-offs in the squares
  which I had been familiar with since moving onto the Larkhall Estate in 1979.
  They too were soon to die out.
  In those years it seemed to me that I was witnessing nothing less than the
  replacement of one population with another in my native city, an event of
  immense historical significance. I used to wonder how any English person could
  go on living their life and going about their normal business when such a
  terrible change was happening. I thought they should be tearing their hair
  out. But not only did they behave normally, but they almost all obeyed the
  unspoken convention that they should not by a single word notice what was
  happening. And I, despite my endless ruminations and inner protest, did
  exactly the same. I was once given lunch by Jason Cowley near Victoria
  Station, he almost immediately asked me what was most on my mind, and I said I
  dared not tell him. He will have known what it was, but quickly dropped the
  subject. It was true that there was one spiky old woman on the estate, who,
  every time I met her, would say ironically, "Is this London?" I shared my
  feelings with her, but not with anyone else. She was written off as a terrible
  racist. I was not. I knew I had to keep my counsel.
  Now, as I write many years later (it is 26th February 2025), I think that so
  many features of the country I see around me - the persistent low
  productivity, the reluctance of the young to work, the deathly stillness of
  the once bustling London streets - are due to a deep collective depression the
  English feel that, after an initial period of resistance, they lacked the
  courage to challenge their coming extinction with even a single word.
  On that Christmas Day in 2005, it was once again the elder Honda who led the
  discussion on racism. I think the company in general talked about my own
  contributions to Prospect, the intervention of Goodhart, the situation as it
  existed then. Then Chris Cviic summed up: "Yes, it has become possible to talk
  about the race situation now. It has even become quite fashionable to be a
  little bit of a racist." And then came the punch-line: "But if you are a
  serious racist, then there is no future for you."
  I sank into depression when I heard those final words. I wanted desperately to
  succeed as a professional author, and I had already come some way towards
  fulfilling this dream. But I had never achieved a book contract for a literary
  work. Why was this? Did those who controlled the gate to success - the
  publishers, the agents, the journalists - suspect that |I was a racist? And
  was I one? I certainly treated everyone the same. I admired the English and
  felt at ease with the European foreigners. My dislike of all the rest was
  ultimately based on their colour. And, if that did not make me a serious
  racist, then what would? I suppose, if I actively discriminated against
  people.
  To write well you must be honest. If you tell a lie, it will be
  evident in the prose. Your real attitude to the world will come through in
  everything you write. To write was my vocation. But, if what Christopher Cviic
  said was true, then there was no future for me there. And so it has proved. As
  I sit at the library computer now, almost twenty years later, I am totally
  forgotten.
   All I write now is this blog. My literary contacts are all gone. I could not call myself a writer any more. But I
  enjoy complete mental freedom. If Putin were to nuke
  London and I escaped beforehand, I would not worry about the fate of anyone there. I once had friends whom I loved and general ideas to which I was
  attached. All that remains of friends and attachments is my loyalty to my own
  people as a Jew.
  Now the Cviic family gave me that they seemed to be so expert at offering that
  day. It was almost three o'clock when lunch ended. For many years I had tired
  to hear the Queen's speech on the television. I expressed my wish to do so on
  on that occasion. The reaction of the Honda Civics, including the camp young
  man, surprised me. They seemed to find my desire to hear our sovereign share
  her thoughts almost hilariously infra dig. I had clearly marked myself out as
  a social inferior by having this extraordinary wish. However, they said there
  was a back sitting-room with a television where I could watch the Queen. They
  would not join me. I think they took me to the cold, dark room, evidently
  little used, and turned the television on, because in those days I was
  absurdly terrified of using a remote control and there were perhaps no buttons
  I could push as I had always done.
  The Queen came on as I sat alone. My loyalty to England, which for many years
  still existed, was centred on the Royal Family, because there was no other
  aspect of the modern country which I could approve. I used to think that if
  the Royals were ever abolished, I would want to leave. But in truth the Queen
  was almost as chilly as the room. I sat there in depression for the fifteen
  minutes.
  After she finished, and I succeeded in turning the television off, I sat there
  for a while, not wanting to return to people I now regarded as my persecutors.
  But quite soon, with a cheerful clatter, they all came in, the Honda Civics,
  the camp young man (and I think now the boyfriend was not present, because I
  cannot imagine him participating in the scene I am about to describe). I
  quickly became animated, and they already were. We discussed our favourite
  music, I think, and I began singing a song I loved, a song of Marlene Dietrich
  about the Berlin she had left and the fact that she still had a suitcase there
  which meant that, one day, she must return:
Ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin
Deswegen muss ich naechstens wieder hin
Die Seligkeiten vergangener Zeiten
Sind alle noch in meinem kleinen Koffer d'rin
  Immediately, almost as if at a hidden signal, the whole company, including
  myself, went into a rendition of Lili Marleen in German. We all knew all the
  words, although I cannot remember ever learning them. We sang all the verses
  in a rapt stillness. I remember Christopher Cviic sitting on the sofa singing
  softly. We brought the song to an end and then we were still.
  What did this curious scene mean? I think it meant that the Civics and the
  camp young man, at least with a part of themselves, were secret Nazis, and
  that I had been brought up, without knowing it, to be one. But they could
  never admit it, except in circumstances of the utmost intimacy. They
  were  pillars of the establishment. Chris had worked, perhaps was still
  working, at the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development. Celia gave
  the most elite of singing lessons. Antonia worked at the Francis Holland
  School. Steve had been at the BBC and even announced Nine-Eleven on the telly.
  They could be Conservatives of course. Chris had advised Margaret Thatcher.
  But Nazis? They could only hint at it in a dark and private room, when someone
  sang one old German song, speaking of nostalgia and commitment, and they
  immediately responded with another, of loyalty and defiance.
  Do I have any other evidence that the Cviic family were Nazis, beyond the
  singing of a German song which, during the Second World War, was equally
  popular in its English version? Well, not very much, I admit. The evidence I
  do have relates to Christopher's childhood and youth, information I have been
  able to glean from the obituaries that appeared of him, for we never discussed
  the matter ourselves.The most relevant one appeared in The Independent on 11th
  March 2011. As has happened before, there seems to be a deliberate change in
  the information I have seen there.
  When I first saw this obituary some months ago now (I write on 24th April
  2025), I was in a period of depression and uncertainty about my search for the
  truth about my grandfather, and I was also reluctant to write anything that
  might depress or upset Steve. So I did not take down the details of what I
  read, one item of which greatly startled me. I will now transcribe the details
  of what I read a couple of days ago, on 22nd April, when I was in London (I am
  now elsewhere). The obituary says that the head of the Gestapo in Croatia was
  billeted on the family in 1941 and the piece manages to imply that this was
  unwelcome. But, if what Steve later told me was correct, and his grandfather
  was a member of the Ustase government, then the presence of the Gestapo would
  have been regarded as a signal honour.
  The piece goes on to say that the Gestapo man tried to be friendly and brought
  flowers for the family and even presents for the young Christopher (or Crsto
  as he was in his childhood). And then it says that "the Gestapo officer" was
  usually out at night interrogating partisans. But, when I originally read the
  piece, rather than saying "the Gestapo officer" it said "he", and from the
  sequence of sentences this clearly indicated that it was the young
  Crsto,  already a most assiduous Catholic, as his son was later to be,
  who was out interrogating the partisans. I could hardly believe that I was
  reading something so damaging in the obituary of a pillar of the British
  establishment, and I remember the original version very clearly. The piece, as
  it is now, reads awkwardly, indicating that a change in it has been made on
  the Internet. I am sure it was the young Crsto who was doing the
  interrogations.
  I had managed to take down all the details I needed from this piece and was
  trying to scroll down to get the name author of the obituary, when a message
  appeared on the screen to say that account was suspected of "suspicious
  traffic" and the obituary vanished from the screen. I tried three times to get
  the piece back, but each time the computer did not allow me to read it. But,
  then in a corner of the screen, I saw another link to the article, clicked on
  it quickly, and this time it was possible to read the obituary. The author,
  named at the bottom, was David Wedgwood Benn.
  I will just give a little more information about the wartime period, gleaned
  from the obituaries. The Independent one said that Christopher witnessed the
  deportation of Jews, including at least one schoolmate, and that he later
  spoke of his horror about being taken to view a Nazi-sponsored anti-Jewish
  exhibition. But surely, at the time, and with his background, the exhibition
  must have filled him with warm approval, and the deportations too. Another
  obituary says that the grandfather was the head of the Croatian post office,
  but if what Steve had told me was correct he must also have held a higher
  position that that. The Catholic Herald obituary had a most arresting
  sentence: "He early showed much of the quiet and determination and ability
  that was to characterise his adult life." Well, clearly, if he was out
  interrogating partisans in the night-time at his tender age.
  Could the avuncular old man I knew be a secret and lifelong Nazi, and his
  family with him? Well, there was a hint of menace about the large and kindly
  presence. And, for many years, when I phoned the house to speak to Steve, and
  Christopher answered, he would give me a few measured words before passing me
  on to his son. But, after I absconded abroad, he just answered and passed me
  on. That was not the act of someone who had ever been truly friendly to me.
  Yes, there was much more than met the eye to Christopher Cviic.
  There was one more unpleasant incident concerning him on that Christmas Day of
  2005. About five o' clock I was sitting with Chris and Steve in the more comfortable
front sitting-room and I happened to mention that my mother was of peasant
origin. Chris remarked in a lordly way that he did not see how this was possible
in an English context. Steve gently mentioned that my mother had come from
Portugal. It seemed remarkable that the elder Honda had known me for about ten
years, I had instructed his son in Portuguese, and he did not know this fact,
which in those days was of such importance to me. It was a sign, I think, of low regard, perhaps even of deliberate falsehood.
Chris, Celia and Steve drove me home in the early evening
(the camp young man had gone early, and Antonia stayed at home) Perhaps Celia
was conscious that the day had been one of tension and discord for me, because
she invented a game which she knew I would like. In turn, each of us had to name
an area of London and the others to say in what part of the city it was found. I
was a champion at this game. I even knew where Northumberland Park was. After
all I had been pounding the streets of my native city for almost thirty years
and had found little satisfaction there. I knew it like no one else did,
however.
When I arrived back at my shabby and disordered council flat, I felt a
sense of immense relief (mingled with sorrow) that the Cviic family were gone,
with their grandeur, passion, ambiguity and disdain. 
The 26th December was a day
to be alone, before the longed-for arrival of Mark the following day. I decided
to walk to and from the centre of London that murky late lunchtime,
although I think there was transport. I was strong enough to do the walk in
those days. A restaurant I used was open for lunch and also, I think, the
second-hand bookshop Any Amount of Books, which I frequented obsessively in my
youth and middle age. On the way back, when it was already dark, I rested for a
while a the end of Millbank, just before Vauxhall Bridge. The well-publicised ziggurat-like head quarters of MI6 were just opposite, across the river. I was
convinced by now that I was of interest to the British spies and to those of
many other nations, and my attachment to England had been slipping for some
years. Now I shook my fists at the huge building opposite and showed my
defiance.
I remember almost nothing of the 27th before the arrival of Mark
around seven in the evening. But before I tell of his coming, I must explain
about Chris Rabbins. This Chris (a far cry from the one I have recently been
mentioning) was a working-class man in early middle-age, an Army veteran, who
had lived on my estate for many years, longer than I had. His flat was perhaps
even more disordered and packed with stuff than mine. He was a slightly rough
person, but had hidden intelligence and sensitivity, and had sought to be my
friend quite quickly after I moved on to Larkhall. Once we were in my flat, and
I played him, on my record player, the Mozart String Quartet K421 in D Minor,
one of the most intense and desperate of Mozart's Quartets. I remember that the
passionate final movement, in particular, filled Chris with delight.
A year or
two before the time of which I speak, Chris had been evicted from his flat, I
think for failure to pay the rent. He did not stray far from the area which had
been his home for many years, and sometimes slept in the yard of a local garage
or in the electricity cupboard which was just in the passage next door to my flat. He knocked on the door frequently, and I sometimes helped him with money to
get into a hostel for the night or allowed him to rest for a while on my sofa.
In early 2005, after my return from a short holiday in Goa, it suddenly occurred
to me that he might be a good person to find me a hitman to kill Flavio, or even to kill him himself, and I
took him to the local McDonald's, treated him to a Filet o' Fish, and proposed
the job. He said he knew a hitman in southern Spain who could do it. I
eventually paid him £2200 (£2000 for the hitman, and £200 for himself, as a
commission). Of course he did nothing and I don't suppose the southern Spanish
hitman even existed. But, after a while being annoyed, I went back to helping my
friend with money and rests on the sofa.
A few days before my departure for
Portugal, about a week before Christmas, Mark had visited my flat to give me his
usual help. As we were coming out to go to the bus-stop (I usually saw him off to his own place there) Chris was hanging around in the square. With my usual democratic
enthusiasm for introducing people of disparate backgrounds to each other, I
tried to make the pair of them friends. But Mark seemed most reluctant to meet
Chris. I received the very faint impression that perhaps they already knew each
other.
And now I come to the darkest of all the evenings I spent with Mark, that of Tuesday, 27th December 2005. He
was always punctual, and surely arrived exactly at the appointed hour.
Initially, he was as friendly as he was imperturbable, the person I knew so
well, the person I had never seen. I began to pour out all the signs that seemed
to tell me that my mother's background was Italian, the strange name Monte Godel
in her "terra", the fact that a landowner called Senhor Pisarmo had once been
important in the district, he house I had seen in one of my walks called The
House of the Jew, Casa do Judeu.
But, to my surprise and displeasure, he
dismissed each one of the slightly flimsy bits of evidence I was advancing as
irrelevant and worth nothing. My mother's background had been entirely
Portuguese, he insisted, although how could he know this for certain? And for
the first time I saw a strange look on his face, flashing on and off, a crafty,
suspicious, evil look, the face of a cornered rat. 
After a while, I switched off
from telling him about my mother, and began saying I believed on my father's
side my family had been Germans and Nazis. Once again the rat-like look came back
to his face, more sinister than before. Now he was even more vehement in his
denials of what I was saying. I was mentally ill, he said, locked in fantasy,
and needed to seek medical help.
I was most disappointed by all this, and Mark
indicated that he wanted to go. But he was in the habit of helping me edit my
pieces of writing, and while I had been in Portugal I had written another,
composing it furiously at a restaurant table in the old town of Faro n my last
full evening. It was about an incident earlier in 2005 when I had been in
Singapore and had painted the walls of an exclusive private close with paint in an effort to get myself arrested for vandalism and receive a Singapore judicial
caning. I had been quickly joined by an Indian woman, perhaps a detective, who
must have ascertained that I was a bit of a madman whom it would be embarrassing
to cane, and I had been allowed to leave Singapore for Australia the
following day. The pretty shocking piece was written in my usual impassive and
elliptical style, without emotion, whether fear or pleasure. Mark read it
quickly, gave it an unconvincing word of praise and opined he could not improve
it.
"Now I really must go," Mark said, and the rat returned to his face a third
time. 
"Bye bye then," I said coldly. And he almost ran to the door and made his
exit.
A very short time passed - perhaps two minutes, I cannot be sure - and
there was a knock at the door. I was now alarmed, and shouted through it,
"Who is it?"
"It's Chris. Let me in."
Normally I would just have let him in. But
this time I looked through the spyhole. And I saw him with both hands holding a
gun and poised to shoot.
"I can't let you in."
 "OK then," Chris said, in a voice
that did not sound very disappointed, and I heard him going away. 
I stood
trembling in my hall a little, and then thought I must phone as many people as
possible and tell them what I had seen.
I cannot really remember the order of
the phone-calls, but am almost sure the first person I phoned was Steve. (Bill
and Richard were out of London, and Mark I believed to be the commissioner of the
attempted murder.) I got Steve's answering machine and summarised what I had seen in
a brief message.
I phoned the author Francis King, who was a sort of patron and
an ambiguous friend. He immediately said I was delusional. Did I not know that
Chris could have shot me through the door if he had wanted to? Enough of such
nonsense, Francis said. I quickly put the phone down on him.
I phoned the author
Jane Gardam, another patron, a better friend. Again the answering machine, and I
left a message.
I phoned the office of my lawyer in Lisbon, Paulo Marques, which
stayed open late into the evening. I left a message for him with a receptionist.
 I phoned the journalist and aspirant author Jason Cowley, another supposed
friend and patron, who was to write a damaging article about me after I went to
prison, in which he said he had already begun to tire of me when the incident
happened. The machine. again a message. He was never to return my call.
I phoned the police.
I had just finished the last of this series of abortive
attempts to alert people, and it was  perhaps about twenty minutes, or even just
fifteen, since Chris had been at the door. Now there came another
knock. I was terrified to answer, but I went to the door and again shouted
through it, "Who is it?"
"It's Steve, Charles. Let me in."
"Oh, Steve, I'm so
frightened. Can I really let you in?"
"Of course you can, Charles. I'm your
friend."
"Yes, you are. OK, I'm letting you in." And I opened the door with huge
relief, and saw his big, smiling face.
And ever since then I have been troubled
by a mystery. When I had phoned and left him the message, it had been surely not
more than twenty minutes before. He could either have been at home and not
answering or he might have been elsewhere. I think he said that he had been at
home. He did not have a car. If he had been at home and picked up the message
immediately and decided to come to me, he would have had to walk from his house
in Elspeth Road (at the bottom of the street, near the Common) up to outside the
Battersea Arts Centre on Lavender Hill, get the bus, travel a bit more than a
mile, and walk from the bus-stop at the other end to my flat. Could he have done
this in twenty minutes? Only with the utmost of good luck. So I conclude from
this that Steve was probably (not certainly) in the area of my flat when Chris,
at Mark's behest, made his half-hearted attempt to kill me. 
And why was that
attempt half-hearted? Because Chris didn't want to kill the goose that laid the
golden eggs. I was regularly giving him the £12 needed to get into a hostel for
the night. Whatever Mark had promised to give him it would only have been that
once. Perhaps he feared Mark would not give him anything. Perhaps he thought
Mark would turn him in to the police. After all, my false friend had only just
left the flat. He could easily have pretended to be an innocent witness. The
word of such a respectable person would be preferred to that of a waif like
Chris.
And why did Mark commission him to kill me? Mark was my minder. He was
not doing his myriad jobs on my behalf for nothing, he was being paid. His task was to
make sure I never discovered the truth about my background. And now I was well
on the way to doing this. He panicked. He was an impotent person and could not
shoot. He had already commissioned Chris to be nearby with a gun, just in case.
He hurried out of my flat as if all the furies in hell were after him in order
to bring about the immediate hit.
And why was Steve nearby? In order to monitor
the situation and, if necessary, to prevent me coming to harm. He was in control
of the electronics in my flat. He will have known of Mark's intent to visit me,
may have known that Chris was standing nearby. Perhaps he even warned him not to
try too hard to kill me. The hapless Mark will have hidden himself from view.
Then Steve will have waited for what he hoped would be just long enough to make his
having come from home plausible, but, impatient to see what I was doing, he did not wait quite long enough. Mark will have been long gone. Chris too.
As always, there is an alternative version of events. This is that Stephen and his family ordered the attempted killing. In this version, Stephen would have been nearby listening in to my conversation with Mark, the latter would have hastened away, and then Steve would have given Chris the go. I think this version of events less likely than the other. Bill, who like Steve, rather distrusted Mark, said that Steve could have had no reason to kill me, but Mark might. Surely, to the Hondas, I would have seemed a promising right-wing person. I did not yet know I was a Jew. True, I had mentioned The House of the Jew, which might have rung alarm bells. My conversation on the 25th cannot have reassured the family. But I have a feeling that if Stephen had commissioned a murder it would have been done. In his more gentle way, he was a steelier person that Mark. He would probably have ordered Chris to shoot through the door if I did not open and I would have been dead. But I am still haunted by the possibility that Bambi tried half-heartedly to kill me and then dealt well with the consequences of his failure to do so.
I don't remember in great detail what Steve and I said to each other, first in the hall and then later, when we moved into my sitting-room. I think he was pretty non-committal about my story, although not denying it. He had a great dislike and contempt for Mark, so he would have joined me in disparaging comments about him. I think he said he just wanted me to be calm and stay happy. It would all have been innocuous stuff.
H told me he had brought two presents. They were films on DVD which I would be able to watch on the television. I don't remember the name of the second one, although it was a good film. The first film, which he said I would particularly like, is very well-known. It was The Shawshank Redemption. This hard-hitting prison drama, I think set in the late 1940s, was not really a nice present. It is an anti-gay film, in which not one but two gay men are done to death in the most brutal circumstances. Perhaps Steve did not think about how I might react to this. Straights can be very oblivious to gay feelings.
Steve did not stay with me very long. I think it was about fifteen minutes, the approximate time it had taken him to reach me.
Two people returned my calls while he was with me (perhaps the second of these rang after he had gone, or as he was just about to go, I think the latter). The first was my lawyer in Lisbon, a smart, bluff, insensitive Anglo-Portuguese who was the great-nephew of Hilaire Belloc. I began telling him the whole story of what I had seen. Steve was making anguished signs to me to stop. Very abruptly, before I could finish the story, Paulo Marques rang off.
The second caller was Jane Gardam. She said she had been most concerned when she got my message, because she had believed that I had really seen what I said I had. But she had phoned Francis King before she rang me, and he had explained to her that I was delusional, and of course she could not doubt the word of such an authority as Francis. She said, as Steve had probably done, that the important thing was that I stay calm and happy. She was pleased that a friend was with me, but then saddened when I told her that he was about to leave or had just left. She said she thought he ought to have stayed a longer time in the circumstances, and I agreed with her.
When I was alone again, I settled down in considerable happiness to watch The Shawshank Redemption. The first fifteen minutes of this film, up to the killing of the first gay, are absolutely brilliant in their fast-moving brutality. Then the whole thing relapses into American-style sentimentality. I was riveted by the initial fifteen minutes, and the film had not gone much further when there came the third knock at the door.
This was the police. They came clattering in with radios in the normal fashion and asked solicitously how I was. By this time, I had realised that nobody at all was going to believe my story, and I had decided to play the world at its own game. I said that I had a brief psychotic episode, that it was now over, and I accepted fully, what everyone was telling me, that I had seen nothing untoward. All this pleased them greatly. They were interested that I was watching The Shawshank Redemption, and they asked me if I thought people could really be redeemed by prison. I said I did not know. But soon I did know, and was to undergo my own peculiar and long redemption.
I have now told the whole story of those fateful four days - 24th to 27th December 2005 - which I have long longed to tell, but did not do so before, because of my feelings for Steve. Now that I have given the world the whole story in print as well as I can, I hope that at least some people will believe me.
I will now go on to tell, in much less detail (because I do not remember all the individual days, and my records are very limited) of how I got the revelation that my grandfather was Goebbels and then go on with an account of that grim year until shortly after my arrest, which came early in the morning of 18th December.2006. This story forms a natural whole in three parts: madness, suicide attempt, murder plot.
The last days of 2005 passed without much incident. I attended a party given by a pair of some of the many friends I had in those days who were more like enemies. I told the mental health authorities that I had had a psychotic episode which had now passed over. When I had first got myself declared mad, I enjoyed the services of a most civilised Brazilian therapist, Dr Eduardo Iacaponi, who presided genially over my increasingly extensive world travels and talked to me rather as an Oxford tutor might do to a bright undergraduate. Unfortunately, Dr Iacaponi had transferred his attention to youth mental health, and I was now assigned to a weaselly little doctor with a long Indian name ending in swamy, who was always known as Dr Swamy.
He thought I had certainly had a psychotic episode but that it was continuing. Also looking after me was a steely blonde English nurse called Louise Harrison who thought I perversely enjoyed the attention my psychosis and grand ideas brought me. Dr Iacaponi had seen me in a delightful old house between Oval and Brixton, but quite soon I was being attended in the more demotic surroundings of 380 Streatham High Road, a place without even a plaque on the door to say what happened there. It was certainly more apt for the downmarket therapists I now had to suffer.
More promising was a development in my masochistic life. I was in the habit of attending the various gay corporal punishment clubs which then existed in London, and at a good one I watched on the screen excerpts from a film called My Borstal Days, set in a 1950s British Borstal and narrated in fine Cockney style by one of the youthful sufferers at Rainsford, remembering with horror and pride the days he spent there. I was most excited by this film, and delighted to learn that one could buy a DVD of it. In the early days of 2006 I was so busy watching it again and again in my flat that I had no time to think about the fact that none of my friends wanted to see me.
Many years later I watched this jewel of Sting Productions again with an experienced gay friend, who pointed out that all the beatings were staged, so that no one was suffering any pain or could get any pleasure from inflicting it. My copy was badly scratched by this time, so that it was only just watchable, but I lost all interest in it when I discovered its brutality was not real. I still have My Borstal Days for nostalgia's sake. They were interested and shocked to discover it in my luggage when I arrived at Rochester Prison, which had been the first real Borstal in Victorian days. I explained to these comical Englishmen that actors had to be over a certain age to participate and then they found it funny.
I have an isolated memory of those early days in January 2006. I once had a long series of pocket diaries in which I had noted down brief details of many days. They would have been an invaluable record, but they were all lost when my suitcases were stolen near the bus station in Barcelona in July 2012. I had been studying them in the bus between Milan and Barcelona. And I remember there was one rare entry in this period, for 8th January, something like "Golan rang."
Golan was a middle-aged devout Muslin family man living in East London. I had met him at a course for trainee teachers which I was attending at the Refugee Council in Brixton between autumn 2000 and the spring of 2001, when I ran away to Portugal without completing the course. It had been necessary to attend to keep my dole money and earn a very little more, by fulfilling the obligation to look for work. The only work that would have been easily available would have been teaching asylum seekers English, and I was already ideologically opposed to the vast number of foreigners then entering Britain, so I was determined never to teach any of them. So I occupied myself in being bolshy towards the bald-headed middle-aged Englishman who was our tutor, "Nosferatu", as we called him, and who was mainly instructing us in political correctness. I would always insist ostentatiously in getting a full tea break between 3.15 and 3.30p.m., and in this way I earned the admiration of my classmates.
They were an unusual and mainly unsuitable bunch. There was one very abrupt and incomprehensible man from the Democratic Republic of Congo who was an enormous admirer of Hitler. There was a Bulgarian lady who had one upper-class English ancestor who had been sent out to Bulgaria by Queen Victoria, and she thought England was for the English and them alone. Golam was more conventional than these. He was a pleasant, quiet person, perhaps of Bangladeshi origin, and he rang on January 8th, some years after the course, to invite me to come out and visit him and his family in East London.
He was certainly an unassuming person, and seemed to admire me very much. But I had once, in private, heard him express his opinions about the Jews, and these were genocidal. It was this attitude, I think, that made me turn down his invitation. I said I was ill. Really, I feared him, although I did not yet know I was a Jew. That was to come nine days later.
There is also one entry from a larger diary that has survived, and this is for 10th January. It is time-dated 11.50p.m. from home, 3, Lucas House. I think I can do little better than to quote verbatim this two-page entry written in a red and black diary  book called "Writers @ |Artists on Love." My entry does indeed speak about love in a twisted way. I add a few explanatory notes in square brackets.
"I was awakened at about ten, by Chris's knock. I know it now, can distinguish it from Tony's more boisterous one [Tony was an indigent and irresponsible upstairs neighbour who, like Chris, often came to me for help - he will reappear later in this story]. He gives it, I think, when he is desperate and pleading, as he must be on this dark night, having presumably failed, like last night, to find shelter, and must retreat to the garage. It is very like mine, two rat-tats, the first more assertive, a most neurotic knock. But he is not my "doppelgaenger". One cannot reach out to others, or very rarely. The flat was all dark, no need to answer.
After a while, I had a long bath, listening to the second two parts of "Mors et Vita" on Classic FM, and I did decide that I must get a human being to reach out to me. I will go to P.de F. in late February [short for Pinhal de Frades, where my flat in Portugal was - I did not in fact go there] and I will plead with that human being who said to me "We will see each other before we go." [I think this was a young man I met on a bus or something, I didn't see him again.] Oh, that it might be for the last time! Continente [the local hypermarket] will be open in all its glory, it will have a new name. But my flat will not have changed, and I will take the picture of the young man [I think this was a postcard of a handsome Aussie surfer I had bought in Sydney and which I cherished for many years until I lost it] as a talisman that I may finally have life."
During that first half of the month I was thinking a lot about my family speculations and what, if anything, might be true about them. I did not believe, as the psychologists said, that I had become psychotic, but there was very little hard evidence to go on. I discussed my ideas once with a group in a central London pub consisting of my friend Richard and his rather hostile circle. I described how we had moved from the house kept by Poles in Stockwell where I was conceived to 19, Hornsey Rise, N19,  kept by the Neapolitan Maccariello family, where we been when I was born. Richard said I had given a convincing picture of a family with Nazi connections moving from one safe house to another. He was one of the people who most persistently thought that I was not psychotic but was on to something about my background and was carefully trying to work out what might and could not be true.
I was deliberately not seeing Mark during this time, which increased my isolation. I usually went round to Bill on a Monday night. Richard, a busy teacher, was not often available. Steve I saw sometimes.
On 15th January, there came the first sign of major disturbance and delusion. Because this incident turned out to have no basis except in my troubled mind, the date has become imprinted in my memory.
On that day I was on my way by bus to Clapham Junction, and the first thing I intended to do was to visit the Wandsworth Library on Lavender Hill. I had long thought of the Clapham Junction area as my "personal playground." There was the library, a Christian cafe which I liked, the Battersea Arts Centre, the Gateway and later Asda store where I often bought reduced packet meals, and the road towards Wandsworth Common. Of all these places, the library, and particularly its reference section, was the dearest to me. Between 1986 and 1995 I had researched there the information about writers and novels for the two big reference books that helped to keep my alive and prosperous during that time. "A writer a day keeps the taxman away," I had said to my friends.
So I stood once more at the bus-stop on the Wandsworth Road outside the Larkhall Estate. I saw two black woman approaching me very rapidly along the pavement towards the bus-stop. One I knew, the other I did not. The older one was Chris's former neighbour in Naylor House, a cheerful elderly West Indian woman, I suppose a typical member of the Windrush generation. The other was a big, fat female, much younger, swinging a big rolled-up umbrella in her large aggressive-looking hands.
They reached stop, and we began talking. The older woman, whom I knew for many years, but whose name I do not remember, introduced the other as her daughter. This person had an American accent and, in the tactless way I often had in my younger days, I questioned this. She had emigrated to the States, I was told. Not very remarkable, I suppose. But I am highly suspicious, a bit paranoid, do not really like blacks, even if they are friendly, as the older woman certainly was. Immediately, I did not believe the younger woman was the elder's one daughter. She was an American spy, and my old friend, linked in some way to her nefarious former neighbour Chris, had been enlisted to help destroy me.
The bus journey began and, as is the way with conversations initiated at bus-stops, our friendly talked stopped. I was seated just behind the exit-door in the middle of the bus, and the two women were just in front of me, standing near the exit. We reached Lavender Hill. I made as if to leave, and said goodbye to the two women. Just as I got out, I thought that the big American had jabbed me in the backside with her umbrella.
And my memory went straight to the assassination of the Bulgarian Markov with a poisoned umbrella by a Russian spy, and I believed the same had happened to me, and that my end was approaching.
I entered the reference  library, and took a seat right at the back, far from the staff desk, without anybody seated near me I was facing the wall. And a mood of the deepest possible peace came upon me. I was fifty years old, and the life I had experienced had not been easy or happy. I had been betrayed by the person I most loved, and I knew I would never really recover. Now I felt surging joy at the prospect of my approaching death. Come quickly, I prayed, death, come quickly.
I had so many happy memories of this library. I had researched the lives of about three hundred writers  here. There had been wonderful reference books available in those days from which I could easily construct my polished prose. Come quickly, death, come quickly 
 And the minutes passed, and I did not die, and my joy evaporated. Please, please, death, come.
 And finally I realised I would not die yet, and I left the library.
During the years that have passed since that strange time I have often stressed that this episode of all the things I believed then was a delusion. Perhaps this insistence on convicting myself of an unfounded notion may surprise the reader. But I have often been accused of being a fantasist about my family story and its consequences for me, and I think admitting the undoubted truth about the two women is a tactic in order to persuade people of my sweet reasonableness and persuade them to look at others of my beliefs by weighing the evidence. This is an uphill task. The evidence is so very complex, the story so strange. In no less an outlet than The Observer, Jason Cowley stated it as incontrovertible fact that I was a fantasist, going on what information he was fed by another false friend, Mark Casserley. Of course everyone will believe The Observer and not me. That is, until and unless some aspect of the truth is dragged kicking and screaming into the limelight. I pray that one day someone will assist me in this.
I have no memories of 16th January, and the scanty records still available to me say nothing of the date. But 17th January 2006 is a day I will never forget.
I began this post by mentioning my attachment to 19, Hornsey Rise. At this troubled time, it had been some years since I had visited the site. But my renewed concern about my family background made it inevitable it would not be long before I went again. It was that day - 17th January, 2006 - that I chose to go. I started in the early afternoon. In my childhood the 14 bus had left from Tottenham Court Road and the terminus was just round the corner from our house, by the house. But now the 91 went from Charing Cross and passed by where the house had been on its way to Crouch End. So it was a less evocative journey. But it proved fateful.
To get to Charing Cross in those days I had to take the 77A (which at a certain point became the 87). I must have done so, but I remember nothing of this part of the journey. The reader may remember that my mother and met my father when she got her finger caught in the door of a tube train, and she met Arthur Ernest Hills, who masqueraded as my father, at the Lyceum Ballroom on the Strand. The 91 would pass both Charing Cross tube and the ballroom, a bit further up.
Just as the 91 pulled away, and just as it must have been passing the entrance to Charing Cross tube, I had a new thought: my parents were Jews! I am a Jew!
This realisation, suggested to me so many times before, and indirectly by my mother, brought me perhaps the most profound joy I have ever experienced in my life. I felt that everything about me had been explained, that for the first time I was really myself, that the link with my past and my parents was crystal strong. As the bus moved slowly along the Strand, I sat back to know myself fully.
It is because of this realisation that I believe, without having any material evidence for it, that the tube station at which my parents met was Charing Cross. But I cannot have believed this at the time, because I still thought my father was Arthur Ernest Hills, who had been met at the Lyceum Ballroom in the Strand. This is now the Lyceum Theatre and is in fact slightly off that street, towards the end of it, just before the Aldwych.
And the bus turned into the Aldwych, up Kingsway and Southampton Row, along the square-interrupted streets of Bloomsbury, into Euston Road and past the great stations, up York Way briefly, and then into the Caledonian Road of my childhood journeys, along Hillmarton Road and Parkhurst Road, another change of route from my childhood, and then it crossed the Holloway Road, and we were in Seven Sisters Road, where in childhood my excitement had reached fever pitch, and, with a lurch, into
 Hornsey Road, which must lead us so soon to Hornsey Rise, where our dear house had stood.
It was a long time since I had made this journey and, confused in my memory,  I thought Hornsey Rise must be very close at the bottom of this stretch of Hornsey Road, and got off at the first available stop.  As I began to walk northwards, the tears I had been holding back began to flow. But no one could see them now. The road was quite long, but what did I care? I walked up, crying piteously, past the grim blocks of modern flats and the Victorian buildings that still remained.  And when I crossed the railway line by Fairbridge Road I knew our house was near, and then the twist in the road with the poor people's shops that I remembered so well, and then I crossed Hazellville Road, the road was going upwards towards the hills of north London, Elthorne Park was there. It was Hornsey Rise.
There followed what was perhaps the most sustained ecstasy of my life. I do not know quite how long it lasted. Perhaps two hours. I just wandered round and round the park. sometimes breaking into the mad running that then punctuated my life, sometimes dancing about, crying and laughing, remembering, full of joy and love and a feeling of union with all human beings and with the world, the trees above me, the flowers at my feet, the stones themselves.
It was so beautiful, like the love of my mother when I was a small child. I do not remember any of my thoughts in detail. But the wild happiness I cannot forget, never will forget.
But this utter conviction of union with human beings happened in the absence of human beings themselves. Often Elthorne Park was noisome with alcoholics and there were children playing games. But on that cold January day the park seemed to be utterly empty during the long period I was there.
Somewhere between six and seven I thought that I must share my joy with other people, and the only available method was by phone. I phoned two friends, the novelist Jane Gardam and the Westminster School teacher Richard Pyatt. They were both formal and very English people. Perhaps I should not have chosen those ones. But they were the people who came to mind.
I think I phoned Jane Gardam first. She was one of the many friends I had made through being editor of PEN News, the newsletter of English PEN, from 1996 to 2002. Various elderly writers who formed the backbone of the organisation trusted me and I reacted with warmth and enthusiasm to the part they had played in the history of Britain. Jane Gardam was less bedraggled than the rest: she had not been dropped or restricted by her long-time publisher. She occupied three residences and once gave me lunch at a woman's university club in Mayfair. I think we sat alone in the commodious dining room and she was impressed by the fact that, although my mother was a Portuguese silver-service waitress, and there was no literary background in the family, I had become a writer. A bit later she tried to invite me to a Portuguese restaurant for dinner, but I had turned against my mother, and thus her country, and rejected this idea rather ungraciously. And, of course, less than a month before the phone-call, there had been the episode where Francis King had persuaded her that I had imagined an attempt on my life.
She greeted me as warmly and professionally as usual, and I blurted out that fact that I was a Jew. Now there was a marked change in her tone. She asked me how I could know this. I said I just did know it. She asked me how I felt about it. And I said it had made me feel happier than I had ever felt before. Always before I had felt oddly out of place. Now I knew who I was.
"I always thought you were very English," she said, "despite your Portuguese mother. Now I see that is not so."
Her words were like the death-knell of our friendship.
And so indeed it proved. I was now entering a period of intense financial difficulty, and she was one of three elderly writers who helped me that summer with £300. That was gallant of her. But when I went to jail I never heard a word. And when I came out, and was in England briefly before going abroad, I did not contact Jane. There were quite a number of people who, on consideration, I dropped, and she was one of them. She died recently, at the age of 96, so there will be no returning.
Much chastened by this call, I tried Richard Pyatt, who was a male friend and coeval, whom I knew much better than Jane. But once again he was a bad person to ring. He is a fairly intelligent, rather conventional Englishman who had grown up in Staffordshire and, as a teenager, had slept in the bed with his dog. At Oxford a veneer of sophistication had been applied and, after one unhappy job, he made a lifelong career as a teacher and then head of English at Westminster School. This prestigious establishment abounded in ambitious and moneyed Jewish pupils and Richard's comments about them were at best patronising. I think there may well be a touch of anti-Semitism about the man, although he also suffers heavily from Islamophobia.
I was even more horrified by this phone-call than by the first. Richard had previously been quite receptive to the new beliefs I had been developing, but now his attitude was frankly incredulous and hostile. I do not remember what we said in any detail, but for the first time the two phone-calls had made me understand how much so many English people secretly dislike the Jews. And that meant they disliked me. Again, I felt this call signalled the death-knell of our friendship.
And, once again, so it proved. When I went to prison, Richard tried to support me, but he was frankly appalled and nonplussed by the fact that I had attacked a woman. Another unfortunate phone-call towards the end of my initial sentence marked the end of our friendship. I think I tried to phone him after my release. but he had changed his number. I have never seen him again. He retired from Westminster early, a much-loved figure, apparently spends much time visiting his numerous friends in the country and, if he still drinks as heavily as he did when I knew him, his end is unlikely to be long delayed.
I have no further memories of 17th January 2006. My mood of ecstasy had turned  depression and, as is usually the case when life becomes unpleasant, I probably returned home and went straight to bed.
(A note, written on 21st October 2021 in the Islington N4 library. Jane and Richard are not the only friends I lost during the twenty-five years between my mother's betrayal and now. In fact, I have lost almost all, and new friendships have survived only if they are pretty distant. The process began immediately after my mother's revelation when the working-class family with whom I had been friendly on my council estate for twenty years turned against me because I had attacked her. Soon afterwards a woman I had known since childhood called Tessa Webster dropped me because she did not like my bitterness that my mother had disinherited me. And so it has gone on. Almost every year has seen the end of one or more friendships, sometimes through death, more often because of estrangement. The people I know now are the dregs at the hand-outs, and I am polite to them while trying to extract whatever I can. For many years I was dependent on others for household tasks, but now, aged seventy, I invite no one to my accommodation and manage alone. I do not regret my former friends. Fuck them.)
As I go on with my account of this momentous period, it seems useful to mention what are my sources. A large occasional diary in a handsome hardback book survives, and there is an entry for 23rd January 2006, which summarises the events of the previous month or so and helps ,me to pinpoint quite a number of events. This, and a subsequent diary going up to the small hours on the day of my arrest, will be main sources for the later part of this post. I have also preserved a few scraps of paper, some official, some personal, which throw light on strange things. It is a pity that I lost my pink pocket diary for 2006, but I have some memories of what this contained (the solicitor in my case used a copy for evidence, so it was brought back to my mind when I was in prison). Also my general memory for 2006, the most catastrophic year of my life, is very strong. Many events seem to be burned on to my mind. I believe what I say here is reliable, although the chronology may sometimes be uncertain, and names forgotten.
The next memory insists in my mind that it dates from the day after I realised I was a Jew, so it must come from 18th January.  With my belief that I was a Jew had come the idea, which I am almost certain, again is true, that the man who was occupying my house, Flavio Rosa, was my half-brother, also the son of my mother. I knew these things in my heart then, but I also wanted confirmation of them from another person in a position to know, and as it happened there was such a person available by phone.
My mother had had one close friend in Altura. This was a woman with the surname of Alcobia Costa (I have forgetten her Christian name, although I once knew it, because my mother often referred to this woman), and she lived with her husband and Down's Syndrome son in a house near Mum's. This woman had died, and the son was gone to a home, but in 2006 Senhor Alcobia Costa, now very old, still lived at home and had taken up with a female companion, somewhat younger than himself and more mentally alert.
When I had been in Altura for those few days in December 2005, I had visited this couple.